Research Article

ENERGY ACCESS, GOVERNANCE, AND TRANSITION PATHWAYS: INSIGHTS FROM SHAPE COMMUNITY IN NIGERIA

Ahmed Ibrahim Butu1*
1 Department of Business Administration Yobe State University, Damaturu, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: butuahmed@ysu.edu.ng
Published: Jun, 2026
DOI: 10.67894/bbr.2026.1wd0cjd0
Pages: 320-354
Views: 36
Downloads: 15

Abstract

Achieving universal access to affordable, reliable, and sustainable electricity remains a major challenge in many developing countries, where rural electrification is constrained by weak institutions, inadequate infrastructure, and limited investment. Although decentralised renewable energy technologies are increasingly promoted to address energy poverty, their long-term sustainability depends as much on governance as on technological performance. This study aims to examine how governance arrangements influence the implementation, sustainability, and scalability of community renewable energy systems using the Shape community renewable energy project in Nigeria as a case study. A qualitative case study design was adopted, drawing on semi-structured interviews, documentary analysis, and field observations, interpreted through the complementary analytical lenses of the Multi-Level Perspective, Transition Management, and Strategic Niche Management. The findings show that the project significantly improved electricity access and generated important socio-economic and environmental benefits. However, its transformative potential was constrained by fragmented governance, weak institutional coordination, limited community participation, financial sustainability challenges, and inadequate organisational learning. The study argues that governance is the principal mechanism linking technological innovation to wider socio-technical transformation in developing-country contexts. It extends sustainability transition theory by proposing a governance-oriented framework that identifies institutional capacity, governance coordination, community agency, financial sustainability, and knowledge diffusion as interdependent capabilities shaping transition pathways. The findings provide practical insights for policymakers, rural electrification agencies, development partners, renewable energy developers, and local communities seeking to strengthen the governance and long-term sustainability of community renewable energy programmes in developing countries.

Keywords

Energy transition; Sustainability transition; Rural electrification; Community Renewable Energy; Energy governance; Nigeria; Transition theory

References

  1. Ahlborg, H., & Hammar, L. (2014). Drivers and barriers to rural electrification in Tanzania and Mozambique: Grid-extension, off-grid, and renewable energy technologies. Renewable Energy, 61, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.057
  2. Ahlborg, H., Boräng, F., Jagers, S. C., & Söderholm, P. (2015). Provision of electricity to African rural communities: How do different institutional frameworks affect sustainability? Energy Research & Social Science, 5, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.008
  3. Aitken, M. (2010). Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1834–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.037
  4. Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Power in transition: An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(4), 543–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009349830
  5. Babanyara, Y. Y., & Saleh, U. F. (2010). Urbanisation and the choice of fuel wood as a source of energy in Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology, 31(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2010.11906283
  6. Barnes, D. F. (2019). Electric power for rural growth: How electricity affects rural life in developing countries. Routledge.
  7. Bauwens, T., Gotchev, B., & Holstenkamp, L. (2016). What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016
  8. Bello, M. A., & Sagagi, M. S. (2017). Governance, growth and poverty reduction in Nigeria: Learning from global experiences. Nigerian Journal of Management Technology and Development, 8(1), 278–291.
  9. Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2012). Energy access programmes and sustainable development: A critical review and analysis. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(3), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.05.002
  10. Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
  11. Blimpo, M. P., & Cosgrove-Davies, M. (2019). Electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa: Uptake, reliability, and complementary factors for economic impact. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1361-0
  12. Bouzarovski, S., & Petrova, S. (2015). A global perspective on domestic energy deprivation: Overcoming the energy poverty–fuel poverty binary. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.007
  13. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  14. Brew-Hammond, A. (2010). Energy access in Africa: Challenges ahead. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2291–2301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.016
  15. Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., & Edwards, G. A. S. (2014). An urban politics of climate change: Experimentation and the governing of socio-technical transitions. Routledge.
  16. Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C. (2018). Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
  17. Butu, A. I., & Strachan, P. A. (2022). Navigating pathways for community renewable electricity in rural areas: Exploring stakeholders' perspectives on the Shape community project. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 33, 19–34. https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.6843
  18. Chaurey, A., & Kandpal, T. C. (2010a). A techno-economic comparison of rural electrification based on solar home systems and PV microgrids. Energy Policy, 38(6), 3118–3129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.052
  19. Chaurey, A., & Kandpal, T. C. (2010b). Assessment and evaluation of PV-based decentralized rural electrification: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(8), 2266–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.04.005
  20. Chilvers, J., & Longhurst, N. (2016). Participation in transition(s): Reconceiving public engagement in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(3), 585–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15613678
  21. Clancy, J., Skutsch, M., & Batchelor, S. (2003). The gender–energy–poverty nexus: Finding the energy to address gender concerns in development. Department for International Development (DFID) UK.
  22. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? Zed Books.
  23. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  24. Day, R., Walker, G., & Simcock, N. (2016). Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework. Energy Policy, 93, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.019
  25. Eberhard, A., Gratwick, K., Morella, E., & Antmann, P. (2017). Independent power projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons from five key countries. Energy Policy, 108, 390–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.023
  26. ESMAP (Energy Sector Management Assistance Program) (2022). Mini grids for half a billion people: Market outlook and handbook for decision makers. World Bank. https://www.esmap.org
  27. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
  28. Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
  29. Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
  30. Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
  31. Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Joule, 1(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018
  32. Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long-term transformative change. Routledge.
  33. Gujba, H., Thorne, S., Mulugetta, Y., Rai, K., & Sokona, Y. (2012). Financing low carbon energy access in Africa. Energy Policy, 47, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.071
  34. Hicks, J., & Ison, N. (2018). An exploration of the boundaries of community renewable energy projects: Navigating between motivations and context. Energy Policy, 113, 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.031
  35. International Energy Agency. (2024). World energy outlook 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024
  36. International Renewable Energy Agency. (2015). Renewable energy in Latin America: An overview of policies. https://www.irena.org
  37. International Renewable Energy Agency. (2024). Renewable energy statistics 2024. https://www.irena.org/publications
  38. Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016). Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004
  39. Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., Schoenefeld, J., Tosun, J., Forster, J., & Boasson, E. L. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2725
  40. Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310
  41. Kirubi, C., Jacobson, A., Kammen, D. M., & Mills, A. (2009). Community-based electric micro-grids can contribute to rural development: Evidence from Kenya. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1208–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.001
  42. Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., & Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
  43. Kooij, H. J., Oteman, M., Veenman, S., Sperling, K., Magnusson, D., Palm, J., & Hvelplund, F. (2018). Between grassroots and treetops: Community power and institutional dependence in the renewable energy sector. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.019
  44. Lawhon, M., & Murphy, J. T. (2012). Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 354–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511427960
  45. Lema, R., & Lema, A. (2013). Technology transfer in the clean development mechanism: Insights from wind power. Innovation and Development, 3(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2013.764628
  46. Lockwood, M., Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C., & Hoggett, R. (2013). Theorising governance and innovation in sustainable energy transitions. Energy Policy, 57, 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.010
  47. Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books.
  48. Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183.
  49. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
  50. Mazzucato, M., & Semieniuk, G. (2018). Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021
  51. Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long-term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
  52. Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
  53. Moner-Girona, M., Bódis, K., Morrissey, J., Kougias, I., Hankins, M., Huld, T., & Szabó, S. (2019). Decentralized rural electrification in Kenya: Speeding up universal energy access. Energy for Sustainable Development, 52, 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.07.009
  54. Newell, P., Phillips, J., Mulvaney, D., & Pueyo, A. (2021). The political economy of clean energy transitions. Oxford Open Energy, 1(1), oiab001. https://doi.org/10.1093/ooenergy/oiab001
  55. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
  56. Palit, D., & Chaurey, A. (2011). Off-grid rural electrification experiences from South Asia: Status and best practices. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(3), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.07.004
  57. Palit, D., Malhotra, R., Kumar, A., & Chaurey, A. (2014). Adoption of off-grid renewable energy systems in rural electrification: Experiences from South Asia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.093
  58. Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Macmillan Press.
  59. Radtke, J. (2025). Understanding the complexity of governing energy transitions: Introducing an integrated approach of policy and transition perspectives. Environmental Policy and Governance, 35(4), 595–614
  60. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
  61. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press.
  62. Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change (Vol. 2, pp. 327–399). Battelle Press.
  63. Rotmans, J., & Kemp, R. (2003). Managing societal transitions: Dilemmas and uncertainties. Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT).
  64. Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651
  65. Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
  66. Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
  67. Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
  68. Sovacool, B. K. (2012). The political economy of energy poverty: A review of key challenges. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.05.006
  69. Sovacool, B. K. (2013). Energy and ethics: Justice and the global energy challenge. Palgrave Macmillan.
  70. Sovacool, B. K., Brisbois, M.-C., Martiskainen, M., Hook, A., & Baker, L. (2020). Decarbonization and its discontents: A critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions. Climatic Change, 155(4), 581–619.
  71. Sovacool, B. K., Hook, A., Martiskainen, M., & Brock, A. (2021). The role of energy justice and energy democracy in renewable energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 73, 101927.
  72. Ulsrud, K., Winther, T., Palit, D., Rohracher, H., & Sandgren, J. (2018). The role of mini-grids in facilitating rural electrification in developing countries: Lessons from case studies. Energy Research & Social Science, 42, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.027
  73. United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals report 2023. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/
  74. Usman, M. H., Kurfi, A. K., & Bello, M. A. (2026). Government support, financial inclusion and SMEs performance in Nigeria: A conceptual framework and literature review. FUDMA Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 4(1), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.33003/fujafr-2026.v4i1.387.421-430
  75. Verbong, G., & Geels, F. W. (2010). Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1214–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.008
  76. Voß, J.-P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5
  77. Walker, G., & Cass, N. (2007). Carbon reduction, the public and renewable energy: Engaging with socio-technical configurations. Area, 39(4), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00772.x
  78. Walker, G., & Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy, 36(2), 497–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019
  79. Wieczorek, A. J. (2018). Sustainability transitions in developing countries. In F. W. Geels, F. Kern, G. Fuchs, N. Hinderer, G. Kungl, J. Mylan, M. Neukirch, & S. Wassermann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sustainability transitions (pp. 491–509). Oxford University Press.
  80. Wierling, A., Schwanitz, V. J., Zeiß, J. P., Bout, C., Candelise, C., Gilcrease, W., & Gregg, J. S. (2021). Statistical evidence on the role of energy cooperatives in the energy transition. Nature Energy, 6(2), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00724-9
  81. World Bank. (2024). Tracking SDG 7: The energy progress report 2024. World Bank. https://trackingsdg7.esmap.org/
  82. Yadoo, A., & Cruickshank, H. (2012). The role for low-carbon electrification technologies in poverty reduction and climate change strategies: A focus on renewable energy mini-grids with examples from Nepal, Peru, and Kenya. Energy Policy, 42, 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.029
  83. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
How to Cite

Butu, A. I. (2026). ENERGY ACCESS, GOVERNANCE, AND TRANSITION PATHWAYS: INSIGHTS FROM SHAPE COMMUNITY IN NIGERIA. Bayero Business Review, 10(1), 320-354. https://doi.org/10.67894/bbr.2026.1wd0cjd0

A. I. Butu, "ENERGY ACCESS, GOVERNANCE, AND TRANSITION PATHWAYS: INSIGHTS FROM SHAPE COMMUNITY IN NIGERIA," Bayero Business Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 320-354, June 2026. doi: 10.67894/bbr.2026.1wd0cjd0

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF View Full Text (PDF) Back to Articles