Research Article

Relevance of System Theory to Open and Close Systems in Organisational Management

Aisha Ahmad Ishaq1*, Auwal Kabir Abdullahi2
1 Department of Business Administration, Kano State Polytechnic
2 Department of Business Administration, Federal University Dutsinma
* Corresponding author: realeesha@gmail.com
Published: Sep, 2023
DOI: 10.67894/bbr.2023.gtqmsr03
Pages: 145-163
Views: 42
Downloads: 7

Abstract

This study explored the system theory and its relevance to open and closed systems in organizational management. The research provided an overview of the system theory, its historical development, and application in modern organizations. The paper analyzed the characteristics of open and closed systems, and discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each system. Additionally, the paper evaluated the effectiveness of open and closed systems in a real-world case study and highlighted the challenges and limitations of their implementation. The study utilized secondary data gathered from existing literature, scholarly articles, case studies, and relevant industry reports, to provide insight in to the relevance of open and close system in organizational management. The implications and significance of the system theory for managing open and closed systems in modern organizations are also discussed. Overall, the paper highlighted the importance of the system theory in organizational management and provided insights for future research and practice. The key findings of the paper revealed that the system theory is essential in understanding the behavior of open and closed systems in organizations. Thus, the study recommends further research and application of the system theory in organizations, particularly in managing open and closed systems effectively.

Keywords

System Theory Open and Close System Organizational Management

References

  1. Aldrich, H. (1979). Organization and Environment. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs.
  2. Alter, S. (2008). Service System fundamentals: Work sytem, value chain and life cycle. IBM System Journal. 47(1), 71-85.
  3. Ashby, H.R. (1958). General Systems Theory as a New Discipline. General Systems (Yearbook of the Society for the Advancement of General Systems Theory). 3, 1-6.
  4. Barile, S. (2006). L'impresa come sistema. Contributi sull'Approccio Sistemico Vitale, I ed. Torino: Giappichelli.
  5. Barile, S. (2008). Impresa come sistema – Contributi sull'Approccio Sistemico Vitale, II ed. Torino: Giappichelli.
  6. Barile, S. (2009). Management sistemicovitale. Giappichelli: Torino.
  7. Barile, S., Polese, F. (2010). Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. Journal of Quality and Service Science. 2(1), in print.
  8. Barile, S., Polese, F. (2010). Smart Service Systems and Viable Service Systems: Applying Systems Theory to Service Science. Journal of Service Science. 2(1/2), 20-39.
  9. Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the Firm. London: The Penguin Press.
  10. Brownlie, D. (1994). The Marketing Book, III ed. Baker. 139-192.
  11. Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M. (1994). The management of innovation.
  12. Cameron, K.S., & Quinn, R.E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Checkland, P. (1997). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  14. Chesbrough, H.W (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
  15. Christopher, W.F. (2007). Holistic Management: Managing What Matters for Company Success. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.
  16. Clark, A. (1993). Associative engines. Boston: MIT Press. Emery, F.E, Trist, E.L. 1960. Socio-Technical Systems. Mana gement science, models and technique, C.W Churchman publis hers. London: Pergamon.
  17. Espejo, R. (1999). Seeing systems: overcoming organizational fragmentation, in Castell, Synergy Matters: Working with Systems in the 21st Century. New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers.
  18. Espejo, R., & Harnden, R.J. (1989). The Viable System Model. London: John Wiley.
  19. Ford, D. (2002). Understanding Business Marketing and Purchasing, III ed. London:
  20. Golinelli, G.M. (2010). Viable Systems Approach (VSA). Governing Business Dynamics. Padova: Kluwer (Cedam).
  21. Golinelli, G.M., Pastore, A., Gatti, M., Massaroni, E., & Vagnani, G. (2002). The firm as a viable system: managing inter-organizational relationships. Sinergie. 58, 65-98.
  22. Grant, R.M., Shani, R., & Krishnan, R. (1994). TQM's Challenge to Management Theory and Practice. Sloan Management Review. Winter, 25-35.
  23. Hakansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1989). No Business is an Island, Scandinavian Journal Of Management, 5(3), 187-200, in Hakansson, H., and Snehota, I. (eds.). Developing Relationships in Business Network. NewYork: Routledge.
  24. Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology. 82(5), 929-964.
  25. Holland, J.H. (1999). Emergence: from chaos to order. Reading Mass: Perseus Books.
  26. Jackson, M. (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  27. Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1966). The social psychology of the organization. New York: Wiley.
  28. Katz, D., & R.L. Kahn. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  29. Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar: adventures in the simple and the complex. San Francisco.
  30. Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. chelsea green publishing.
  31. Mele, C. (2003). Marketing Qualitànell'impresacreavalore. Padova: The evolving path of TQM: towards business excellence and stakeholder value. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. 23(5).
  32. Mele, C., & Polese, F. (2010) Key dimensions of Service Systems: Interaction in social & technological networks to foster value co-creation, in
  33. Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  34. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Random House.
  35. Sterman, J.D. (1994). Learning in and complex systems. System dynamics review, 10(2-3), 291-330.
  36. Sterman, J. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world.Boston: McGraw Hill.
  37. Tien, J.M., & Berg, D. (2003). A case for service systems engineering. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 12(1), 13-38.
  38. Vicari, S. (1992). Risorseazeindali e funzionamento d'impresa in Finanza, Marketing e Produzione, 3.
  39. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1956) General System Theory, in Emery, F.E. (eds.). General System, Yearbook of the Society for the Advancement of General System Theory.
  40. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1962). Modern Theories of Development. New York: Harper.
  41. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller.
  42. Von Foerster, H. (1981). Observing Systems Seaside:Inter Systems Pubblication. 134
  43. Weinberg, G.M. (2001). An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Dorset House Publishing Company, Incorporated; 25 Anv edition, April.
How to Cite

Ishaq, A. A., & Abdullahi, A. K. (2023). Relevance of System Theory to Open and Close Systems in Organisational Management. Bayero Business Review, 7(1), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.67894/bbr.2023.gtqmsr03

A. A. Ishaq, and A. K. Abdullahi, "Relevance of System Theory to Open and Close Systems in Organisational Management," Bayero Business Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 145-163, September 2023. doi: 10.67894/bbr.2023.gtqmsr03

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF View Full Text (PDF) Back to Articles