Research Article

Re-examining the Perceived Complexity of Public Administration and its Implication for Research in the Discipline

Audu Aminu1*, Muhammad Babuba Sa’adatu2
1 Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Anyigba, Kogi State- Nigeria
2 Department of Political Science, School of Social Sciences, Federal College of Education, Kano State- Nigeria
* Corresponding author: audu4aminu@gmail.com
Published: Jun, 2024
DOI: 10.67894/bjms.2024.nuknrtjm
Pages: 156-169

Abstract

The intricate nature of Public Administration as a discipline is well established in literature but a concern that stems from such disposition is its implication for the discipline‟s research tradition/methodology. This paper attempts to contribute to the longstanding debate of what constitute the research tradition of Public Administration by first re-examining the question of why Public Administration as a discipline is complex with focus on issues categorized as endogenous (i.e. issues that stem from within) and exogenous factors (issues that stem without from research environment) in the discipline. Again, the paper also sought to highlight some of the challenges researchers face in conducting inquiry in the field and their implication for research. To achieve the above objectives, relevant literatures such as journal articles and books were consulted. The paper argues that contention over identity of Public Administration, the evolution and presence of multiple paradigms are among major endogenous sources of complexity of discipline while the influence of other disciplines and environment of Public Administration are among key exogenous factors. The paper argues also that researchers contend with a number of dilemmas including the challenge of standardization of research approach. The paper therefore concludes that Public Administration researchers must have a deep understanding of multidisciplinary (especially social science and management science) research traditions and methodology as well as each research environment/context to align with global best practices and the evolving tradition of Public administration research. 

Keywords

Complexity Public Administration Research Methodology

References

  1. Bauer, M. (2018). Public administration and political science. In E. Ongaro & S. Van Thiel (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of public administration and management in europe (pp. 1049–1065). Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller.
  3. Bovaird, T. (2008). Emergent Strategic Management and Planning Mechanisms in Complex Adaptive Systems. Public Management Review, 10(3), 319–340.
  4. Castelnovo, W., & Sorrentino, M. (2017). Engaging with complexity in a public programme implementation. Public Management Review, 20(7), 1013–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1364406
  5. Chakrabarty, B., and Chand, P., (2012). Public Administration in a globalizing world: Theories and practices. Sage
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Pearson
  8. Dahl, R. A. (1947). The Science of public administration: Three problems. Public Administration Review 7(1): 1–11.
  9. Durant, R. F., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2017). The hollowing of American public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 719-736.
  10. Eppel, E. A., & Rhodes, M. L. (2018). Complexity theory and public management: a 'becoming' field. Public Management Review, 20(7), 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1364414
  11. Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C., & Licari, M. J. (2018). The public administration theory primer. Routledge.
  12. Head, B. W. (2010). How can the public sector resolve complex issues? Strategies for steering, administering and coping. Asia Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2(1), 8–16.
  13. Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy: Understanding and responding to complex challenges (p. 176). Springer Nature.
  14. Holland, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press.
  15. Hustedt, T., Randma-Liiv T., & Savi, R. (2020). Public administration and disciplines. In G. Bouckaert & W. Jann (Eds.), European perspectives for public administration: The way forward. (pp. 129-146), Leuven University Press.
  16. Hussain, M. A., Elyas, T., &Nasseef, O. A. (2013). Research paradigms: A slippery slope for fresh researchers. Life Science Journal, 10(4), 2374-2381.
  17. Jalonen, H. (2024). A complexity theory perspective on politico-administrative systems: Insights from a systematic literature review. International Public Management Journal, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2024.2333382
  18. Klijn, E. H. (2008). Complexity theory and public administration: What's new? Key concepts in complexity theory compared to their counterparts in public administration research. Public Management Review, 10(3), 299-317.
  19. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology, methods and techniques (2nd revised ed.). New Age International (P) Ltd.
  20. Kumar, R., (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage.
  21. Lynn, L. E. (2005). Public management: Old and new. Routledge.
  22. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  23. McNabb, D. E. (2017). Research methods in public administration and nonprofit management. Routledge.
  24. Meek, J. W. (2010). Complexity theory for public administration and policy. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 12(1), 1.
  25. Meier, K. (2015). Proverbs and the evolution of public administration. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12288
  26. Mitchell, D. (2018). Strategic implementation: An illustration of theory/practice disconnect in public administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 59–89.
  27. Ongaro, E., Gong, T., & Jing, Y. (2021). Public administration, context and innovation: A framework of analysis. Public Administration and Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAD.1902.
  28. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375-387.
  29. Osborne, S. P., Cui, T., Aulton, K., & Macfarlane, J. (2023). Theory and practice in dis-harmony? Toward a praxis ecosystem approach to the public administration and management discipline and profession. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 45(1), 44-61.
  30. O'Sullivan, E., Rassel G. R. and Berner, M., (2007) Research Methods for Public Administrators. London: Routledge.
  31. Pollit, C., (2020). Shadowland: The poorly-mapped, underdiscussed yet vital interface between public administration research and practice. In G. Bouckaert & W. Jann (Eds.), European perspectives for public administration: The way forward. (pp. 249-271), Leuven University Press.
  32. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books.
  33. Renwick, C., (March 1944). "Public Administration: Towards a Science," The Australian Quarterly
  34. Rhodes, M. L., & Eppel, E. A. (2018). Public Administration and Complexity–or how to teach things we can't predict?. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 4(1), 1-9.
  35. Riccucci, N. M.,(2010). Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Georgetown University Press.
  36. Riccucci, N. M., (2007). The Logic of Inquiry in the Field of Public Administration. In K. Yang & G. J. Miller, (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration [2nd ed.] (pp. 3-11). Taylor & Francis.
  37. Rosenhead, J., Franco, L. A., Grint, K., & Friedland, B. (2019). Complexity theory and leadership practice: A review, a critique, and some recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101304.
  38. Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., Borick, C. P., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Introducing public administration. Routledge.
  39. Stritch, J. M., Pedersen, M. J., & Taggart, G. (2017). The opportunities and limitations of using Mechanical Turk (Mturk) in public administration and management scholarship. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 489-511.
  40. Teisman, G., & Gerrits, L. (2014). The emergence of complexity in the art and science of governance. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 1(1), 17-28.
  41. Teisman, G. R., & Klijn, E. H. (2008). Complexity theory and public management: An introduction. Public management review, 10(3), 287-297.
  42. Tenbensel, T. (2020). Bridging complexity theory and hierarchies, markets, networks, communities: a 'population genetics' framework for understanding institutional change from within. In Complexity Theory in Public Administration (pp. 84-103). Routledge.
  43. Van der Waldt, G., (2017). Theories for research in Public Administration. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(9), 183-202
  44. Vogel, R., & Hattke, F. (2022). A century of Public Administration: Traveling through time and topics. Public Administration, 100(1), 17-40.
  45. Waldo, Dwight (1955) The Study of Administration. Random House.
  46. Wernli, D., Böttcher, L., Vanackere, F., Kaspiarovich, Y., Masood, M., & Levrat, N. (2023). Understanding and governing global systemic crises in the 21st century: a complexity perspective. Global Policy, 14(2), 207-228.
  47. Wright, B. E. (2015). The Science of Public Administration: Problems, Presumptions, Progress, and Possibilities. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 795–805. doi:10.1111/puar.12468
  48. Yang, K., Zhang, Y., & Holzer, M., (2007). Dealing with multiple paradigms in public administration research. In K. Yang & G. J. Miller, (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration [2nd ed.] (pp. 25-43). Taylor & Francis.
How to Cite

Aminu, A., & Sa’adatu, M. B. (2024). Re-examining the Perceived Complexity of Public Administration and its Implication for Research in the Discipline. Bayero Journal of Management Sciences, 6(1), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.67894/bjms.2024.nuknrtjm

A. Aminu, and M. B. Sa’adatu, "Re-examining the Perceived Complexity of Public Administration and its Implication for Research in the Discipline," Bayero Journal of Management Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 156-169, June 2024. doi: 10.67894/bjms.2024.nuknrtjm

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF View Full Text (PDF) Back to Articles