Effects of assets liability management on the solvency margin of insurance companies in Nigeria
1 Department of Finance, Redeemer’s University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria.
2 Department of Insurance and Actuarial Science, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos State, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: jinadum@run.edu.ng
2 Department of Insurance and Actuarial Science, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos State, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: jinadum@run.edu.ng
Abstract
Asset and liability management is the strategic management of the balance sheet, for risk
optimization of assets and liabilities taking into account all market risks. This is to ensure that the
company’s assets are not below its liabilities thereby making the organization financially viable.
Asset-liability management serves as a cost /profit function which takes into account the assumed
risk, level of earnings and liquidity of the bank. The study is an empirical investigation of the
relationship between assets-liability management and solvency margin in the insurance companies.
The data for the research were collected from the annual reports and financial statement of six
insurance companies from 2006 to 2020 using the audited accounts of the selected companies. The
sample size for this study consists of six insurance companies made up of two life assurance
companies, two general insurance companies and two composite companies. The findings from
the analysed data showed that the relationship between asset-liability and solvency margin of an
insurance company in Nigeria, the analysis showed that there is a relationship between asset
liability and solvency margin of an insurance company in Nigeria. It also established that a positive
Correlation between asset-liability and solvency margin with correlation coefficient of 0.995
which implies that there is strongly positive linearly correlation which is also significant between
asset-liability and solvency margin. The analysed data showed that there is significant relationship
between asset-liability management and a weak relationship between the liabilities of the
companies and their solvency margin. This has a direct impact on the performance of the
companies and by extension their abilities to meet their general obligations. Also the result from
the t-statistics also reveals that the null hypothesis that the null hypothesis stating that poor asset
liability management will not affect the ability of insurance companies in complying with their
statutory duty on solvency margin should be rejected.
Keywords
Asset
Liability
Insurance
Management
Solvency
References
- Alberti, M. (2001) Brief ECON 510EN: The solvency margin system. Luxembourg: European parliament.
- Al Subiri, F.N (2010). Impact of Bank Assets and liability management on profitability. Empirical investigation. Journal of Applied Research in Finance, 2(4), 101-109.
- Bagram, N., & Can, M (2013). Asset-Liability Management Models in Decision making. Journal of Business and Finance, 11-16 accessed from http:www. escijournals.net/JBF
- Beck, K.C., Goldreyer, E.F. & d' Antonia L.J (2000). Duration Gap in the context of a Bank's strategic planning decisions, 13(2), 57-71
- Dash, M. (2013). A Study of the impact of asset-liability management on the profitability of Banks in India. Journal of Applied Management and Investments, 2, 230-233.
- Federal Government of Nigeria (2003) Insurance Act Lagos: Federal Government Press.
- Financial Services Authority (2012). Definitions of financial ratios-solvency of life insurance.
- Gour, B & Gupta, M.C (2012). A Review on Solvency Margin in Indian Insurance Companies. International Journal of Recent Research and Review, 11, 43-46.
- Joshi, S.P &Sontakay, R.V (2017). Review paper on Asset liability management in banking system. Imperial journal of interdisciplinary research (IJIR), 3(6), 670-678. Accessed on 16/10/18 from http://www.onlinejournal.in
- Kusy, M, & Ziemba, W.T (1986). A Bank asset and liability model. Operations Research, 34(3), 356-376
- Markowitz, H (1952) Portfolio Section. Journal of finance, 7, 77-91
- Pragatti, K.M & Veena, K.P (2018) An Analysis of Asset-Liability Management in Banking Sector: A case study of Kotak Mahindra Bank. 10SR Journal of Business ed Management, 20(2), 1-7 accessed on 16/10/18 from www.10srjournals.org
- Rosen, D., &Zenios, S.A (2006). Enterprise-wide asset and liability management: issues, institutions, and models. Handbook of Asset and Liability Management: Theory and Methodology, 1, 1
- Pentikainen, T. (n.d.). On the solvency of Insurance companies, n.p. accessed from www.actuaries.org/LIBRARY/AUSTIN/vol4no3/236.pdf
- Sharpe, W.f., & Tint, L.G (1990). Liabilities – a new approach. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 16(2), 5-10
- Thorburn, C. (2004) On the Measurement of Solvency of Insurance Companies Recent Developments that will alter methods adopted in emerging markets. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3199, 3
- Trenca, 1. & Cociuba, M. (2014). How does assets liabilities management affects the profitability of banks? Journal of Accounting and management, 4(3), 47-50
- De Wit, G. W. and Kastlijn, W. M. (1980) The Solvency Margin in non-life insurance companies. Austin Bulletin, (1980) 136-144
- Uyemura, D.G, Van Deventer, D.R & Foundation, B.A.I (1993). Financial risk management in banking: the theory & application of asset liability management. New York: Bankers Pub. Co.
- Vaidyanattan, R (1999). Asset-liability management: Issues and trends in Indian Context. ASCI Journal of Management, 29(1), 39-48
- Zenios, S.A, & Ziemba, W.T (2007). Handbook of Asset and Liability Management: Theory and Methodologies (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: North Holland.
How to Cite
N, J. M., & Feyisayo, O. F. (2024). Effects of assets liability management on the solvency margin of insurance companies in Nigeria. Bayero University Journal of Finance, 1(2), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.67894/bjf.2024.3wv0y621
J. M. N, and O. F. Feyisayo, "Effects of assets liability management on the solvency margin of insurance companies in Nigeria," Bayero University Journal of Finance, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 76-86, December 2024. doi: 10.67894/bjf.2024.3wv0y621